Recently, I had a wonderful conversation with Castus regarding; the priesthood and how it seems so many pagans are against it (While I feel the exact opposite is true. Too many pagans think they’re priest/esses), Roman theology and the lack of Religio resources when compared to Hellenismos, the role of the imperial cultus on the culture and politics of Rome, and finally the role Nova Roma plays in our modern society.
I was a member of Nova Roma for a little less than a year before leaving. It was nothing bad mind you. I didn’t have a falling out with anyone, but for all intents and purposes it appeared to be nothing more than a large role-playing group that took themselves way too seriously. Politics, scandal, side groups where consuls were mocked and orators’ names dragged through the mud, it all seemed very Roman, but not in the best way.
I will admit, albeit none to gladly, that I carried this notion with me for the time following. I respected Nova Roma’s dedication to strenuous education, the Latin language, and Republican virtues; but I felt there was some kind of disconnect between the members and their goal. Castus helped me see not only that I was sorely mistaken in regards to Nova Roma but also how such an organization can be necessary for many Reconstructionist communities, despite the grief they may gain from a sub-culture hell bent on not having any form of governing body.
Where Hellenists have many groups; Hellenion, Neos Alexandria, Kyklos Apollon, Hellenismos Mysticism, Nekoroi, etc to provide aid in the development of a standard religious practice, the Religio lacks this kind of support network and Nova Roma fills this role. The same statements one can make about this organization are much the same as can be made for any number of religious orders with such an obvious minority. There are bound to be big egos, high ambitions, and those who get by on donum alone.
Nova Roma, however, does offer something rare in the greater pagan community; the ability to exist despite the many differences in theological practice between its members. This creates an atmosphere where discussion, and even disagreement, isn’t met with ego-driven histrionics but the ability to eloquently state one’s case. Though Castus and I do not share similar values in some respects, we both hold the same ability to disagree and continue speaking as equals.
While Nova Roma may have some steps to take to fully embrace its role as a religious organization (I’m sure Castus can speak better on that than I) it appears to help nurture the inquisitive and knowledge hungry; while encouraging piety and wisdom. That may not mean much these days, but it’s certainly nice to see.
So there you have it folks. Not only was I wrong, I was dead wrong. If you’re interested in learning about Religio-Romana, Nova Roma, or reading the thoughts of a devout cultor, go to a dedicated source.
